Full sun vs full sun

-

The one on the left receives direct sun from about 12 PM to sundown. The one on the right gets full sun from around 7 AM till the sun vanishes from the horizon. As far as insolation is concerned, both plants benefit from direct sunlight, and yet the results are vastly different. Because as you can see, not all "full sun" are equal.


A week ago, I saw a post on Facebook about an Echeveria 'Black Prince' that appears etiolating, with conspicuously brightish green leaf bases. According to the owner, her plant receives "full sun", but having seen hundreds, if not thousands, of succulents, I know what "full sun" does to plants. And her plants certainly do not fall into the category. When I inquired about the length of time, she said it's 8 hours. My plants (when pertinent, because this logically excludes the ones that prefer more shade) receive roughly 11 hours of full sun every day. It would have been more if not for the mountain range that stretches from our eastern corridor (not that I'm complaining), but you get the idea. Three hours may not seem much, but that's a 21-hour difference per week, or roughly 84 hours per month. So in the long run, there's just a mountain of a difference between plants grown in "full sun" for a limited amount of time versus one that gets it throughout the day. And I believe that this should be addressed because I frequently see photos of plants that supposedly are under "full sun" but the appearance says otherwise, or the plants are standing next to a wall. Full sun is defined by full exposure from sun up to sundown. Full access while the sun is out. If the plants are benefitting from the sun only for a limited amount of time, then these are not getting 'full sun' but 'direct sun' and the time duration should be specified. One may argue that my plants aren't really getting 'full sun' because of the above-mentioned mountain range that blocks the sun in the early morning hours, but in the full ferocity of the tropical sun, it really does not matter. In the examples shown here, the one getting full insolation is darker and more compact. In shorter daylight hours, the leaves begin to stretch in an effort to reach for the light. Additionally, the foliage is less firm and there is an overall lack of vigor, though novices usually won't appreciate the difference until the plants have reached the point of downright fugliness. The leaf bases of 'Black Prince' are normally green, but plants that aren't getting enough have the green a paltry hue whereas specimens in harder conditions have a deeper green that is heavily overlayed with anthocyanin (dark) pigmentation.

Another matter that needs clarifying is the term "full sun" itself. If your plants are under some form of shading, no matter how wispy, then it isn't full sun anymore, but 'filtered sun'. So get your definitions right, kids!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plants and places: a list of places in the Philippines that were named after plants

-
Image
Many place names within the Philippines were taken from plants, historical figures, or from water features or references to it. However, the former appears to be much more widespread and perhaps reflect the early people's affinity with such plants, perhaps as sources of folk medicine, food, utilities, or simply as landmarks. Unfortunately, most of these place names no longer bear the plants so honored, and the meaning of such names have been largely lost to obscurity. Our so-called 'progress' has pulled us farther and farther away from nature: the nonstop road widening projects during the last five years have wreaked havoc on not a few roadside trees. A Facebook post shows the last and only known Acacia confusa - a Philippine endemic- along the Olongapo-Bugallon Road in the western Luzon province of Zambales that is slated for cutting. Some names are contentious, such as 'Balicbalic' and 'Vigan'. Still, many of these place names reflect a place's topogr
Read more

Distinguishing Alocasia boyceana, A. heterophylla, and A. ramosii, and some words about asking for plant identification

-
Image
  In the Philippines, three commonly encountered Alocasia species are frequently mixed with one another that identification of plants posted in social media has resulted in a muddied concept of what constitutes what, with most plants getting labeled as ' Alocasia heterophylla ' even though practically no one can elucidate why he thinks it is that species. More on that later. Still, admit I should that I, too, was confused not too long ago until I got fed up with my own ignorance and decided to undo it once and for all. I now show thee the path to thy enlightenment. The main aim of this article is to allow you to reliably identify which is which. I am going to keep this ultra-simplified, so I am not going to talk about floral morphologies. People usually don't catch them in flower anyway and very few have the inclination to save dissected inflorescence samples in an alcohol solution for later reference. The other aim, well, we'll get to that later. Alocasia heterophylla
Read more

Phalaenopsis: a photographic compendium of Philippine species

-
Image
The genus  Phalaenopsis  requires no introduction, and its species, in their myriad variations and color forms, are still much sought around the world even after more than a century of introduction. And for this post, I present to you the Philippine species which are among the most spectacular in the genus. Phalaenopsis amabilis Phalaenopsis amabilis labellum Phalaenopsis amabilis , albinistic form Phalaenopsis aphrodite subsp. aphrodite Phalaenopsis aphrodite subsp. formosana Phalaenopsis intermedia Phalaenopsis intermedia, red lip Phalaenopsis intermedia, yellow lip Phalaenopsis intermedia, pink form Phalaenopsis philippinensis Phalaenopsis sanderiana Phalaenopsis sanderiana Phalaenopsis schilleriana Phalaenopsis stuartiana Phalaenopsis stuartiana fma.  nobilis Phalaenopsis  x  veitchiana Phalaenopsis equestris Phalaenopsis  equestris  fma . alba A
Read more